tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1202812533823065699.post528410339127069313..comments2011-07-23T08:29:56.680-07:00Comments on Masters Action Research: Assessing Resistance and Risk for the Pilot StudyLisahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16900142896889786659noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1202812533823065699.post-6749575405373199202011-07-02T07:56:07.247-07:002011-07-02T07:56:07.247-07:00Thanks for these really helpful comments Richard. ...Thanks for these really helpful comments Richard. I have now added to the original post and have considered other risks, as prompted. <br />I think that I have addressed your other questions in the updated post. I take your point about the use of the word "good".Lisahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16900142896889786659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1202812533823065699.post-51670051326667651372011-07-01T08:18:18.402-07:002011-07-01T08:18:18.402-07:00Hi Lisa,
1. On risks: think about technical risks...Hi Lisa,<br /><br />1. On risks: think about technical risks [cloud-based or in-house services] and evaluation risks [data collection, user engagement etc.]<br /><br />2. When you say "can involvement be inclusively synchronous?" what do you mean?<br /><br />3. When you note "Good and representative participation", do you mean good-enough?<br /><br />4. Link your risks to the SWOT analysis - which is really good [as is teh stakeholder analysis].<br /><br />Richard.Richard Hallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14282458219573470775noreply@blogger.com